Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
George Mason University Infoguides | University Libraries
See Updates and FAQss for the latest library services updates.

Cybersecurity Engineering

Use the resources on this guide to help you do research related to cybersecurity.

Learning to Evaluate Information

Evaluating information is a skill that you develop and learn to apply. Think more in terms of "it depends" instead of always.  For example,

  • Information on Web pages is not always wrong, but the information is not always right either. Web content can be produced by anyone, so it depends on the authority of the source (along with other factors).
  • Information accessible from the Internet is not always unscholarly. For example, there are scholarly articles provided by reputable publishers. There are handbooks and reports produced by government authorities. Therefore, it depends on the authority of the source (along with other factors) in this case as well.
  • Older information is not always outdated. There are subjects and topics that remain true over time, so it depends on the topic (along with other factors).
  • Information from manufacturers is not always biased. For example, manufacturers provide technical data sheets and materials safety data sheets about their products based on facts, not opinion. Therefore, it depends on the purpose of the document (along with other factors).

In the tutorials on this page, you will learn guidelines or "things to consider" when you decided if particular information is credible.

How to Evaluate the Quality of Information

Find out how to critically evaluate information from this video tutorial by Western University Libraries (2.17 min.).

The same information found in the video can be found on Evaluating Sources: The CRAAP Test by Washington State Libraries.

Note: Select 720p from settings button if possible.

Is the video not visible? Check your browser compatibility. opens new window

If your browser is compatible, try the video, Evaluating Sources, on YouTube.

Peer Review in 3 minutes (video, approx. 3 min.)

Describes the process, including peer review, for a journal article being published. This video was created by NCSU and it is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 opens new window. A transcript is available on YouTube.

Note: Select 720p from settings button if possible.

Is the video not visible? Check your browser compatibility. opens new window

If your browser is compatible, try the video, Peer review in 3 minutes, on YouTube.

Determine if an Article is Relevant More Quickly

You will look and find more literature than you will use for your project. When I started research, I used to read each article or document from front to back. If I determined that an article was not relevant, I still spent quite a bit of time in reading it.

If you read certain parts of the article in a different order, it will minimize the time that you spend on articles that are not relevant. The following video from Western University does a good job explaining how to approach reading articles efficiently (2.34 min.).

A transcript of this video is available after the video on Western Library's Web site. How to Read a Scholarly Article Transcript

Note: Select 720p from settings button if possible.

Is the video not visible? Check your browser compatibility. opens new window

If your browser is compatible, try the video, How to Read a Scholarly Article, on YouTube.